| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration will allow you to join in the discussion which is amazingly free of personal rancor and trolls! We are currently looking for posters from both the left and the right who have a demonstrated capacity to discuss fervently without letting personalities get in the way. Is that you? We need more staff. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| They just don't get it.; It has zero to do with "age appropriate" | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 2 2008, 09:57 PM (179 Views) | |
| Post #1 Nov 2 2008, 09:57 PM |
|
|
Teacher forces students to sign "gay pledge." The administrators don't get it. The problem is not that the pledge is "age inappropriate." The problem is that the pledge is for many "moral inappropriate," and some teacher is ramming her morals down the collective throats of her students. Parents must retain the right to teach their children that the Christian religion explicitly teaches that homosexual behavior is a sin. And, while no one needs to be ugly to an individual about it, neither should anyone be forced to sign a pledge of "support" for those who choose to live that lifestyle. If a teacher forced an 18-year old child (not just a kindergartner) of mine to sign such a pledge (or even indicated that signing it was the moral thing to do without granting any child the opportunity to express otherwise if he so chose), I'd be at the school in a shot demanding that the teacher be disciplined. But, this pledge is a tenet of the new secular religion that is rising in America, the religion that is becoming the official religion that the Constitution forbids, the religion that is espoused by those who claim to support separation of church and state. So, to some, it is acceptable--no, not just "acceptable," but "required"--indoctrination in public schools. They just don't get that some in this nation still practice religion founded in the actual words in the Bible and that our Constitution protects their right to do so--without governmental interference. |
![]()
Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| « Previous Topic · Education · Next Topic » |






![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




6:20 PM May 20