Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
If the board disappeared from view for an hour, it is just because we changed our provider of domain name services. Look for the all-new eye95.com, coming soon. This board will become a subfeature of that site.
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration will allow you to join in the discussion which is amazingly free of personal rancor and trolls!

We are currently looking for posters from both the left and the right who have a demonstrated capacity to discuss fervently without letting personalities get in the way. Is that you? We need more staff.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Mainstream Media Bias on Iraq
Topic Started: Jan 16 2006, 02:11 PM (252 Views)
eye95
They just can't stand to tell a positive story about what is going right in Iraq. Here are the first two paragraphs in story headlined about the election results.

Link to AP article

The Associated Press
January 16, 2006
Tiny Percentage of Iraqi Votes Thrown Out

By JASON STRAZIUSO, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 58 minutes ago

BAGHDAD, Iraq -
Iraq's electoral commission said Monday that it is throwing out votes from 227 ballot boxes in last month's parliamentary elections because of fraud, a tiny percentage of the total vote that shouldn't greatly affect overall results.

The announcement came after a U.S. helicopter crashed north of Baghdad, but the fate of the two-man crew wasn't immediately known. A car bomb also killed six people and wounded 19 in the town of Muqdadiya.
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
Son N Law
*Puts on his Devil's Advocate hat*

Is this really a good example of bias, though? And isn't asking for a completely positive story about war advocating bias, even if it's in the opposite direction?

I can see how someone (not me, but someone) could just as well say, "They can't do a single story about this war without putting some positive spin on it. The story isn't even about the elections, but they still had to point out how tiny the fraction of thrown-out votes just to make it look like everything's A-OK."
Member Avatar
Fool, apparently
[ *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
eye95
The point is that there is zero logical reason for the second paragraph. It has nothing to do with the story. Why is it there? The only reason I can come up with is bias. Reporting the facts of the election, as is, gives the impression that the plan in Iraq is working. One naturally wonders if their agenda is to create the impression that we are not succeeding.
Member Avatar
Administrator
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
Son N Law
Whoa, this is strange. Follow your link again. The piece has changed completely since you posted it and I read it.

Anywho... as for the original piece, I do agree that the second graf seemed way out of place. The lede was clunky as all get out and the author(s) didn't do much of anything to demonstrate a link between the two events. The replacement piece seems to flirt with a tenuous connection, but not very well. Biased journalism? Not sure I would agree there, since the intent seemed to be a mix of the good and the bad, even if the execution was extremely ham-handed. Just plain bad journalism? Yeah, I'll agree with that 100%. :)
Member Avatar
Fool, apparently
[ *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
cboykin
*Ranting* That particular piece does seem to be "what started out as a good news story and had to throw in some bad to make it more interesting" to me, but that's a little beside my point. I am so tired of hearing ALL of the horrible stuff that's going on over there on the news (OK - told ya' - my hubby watches it all of the time and I listen), but the only "good news" I get from what's going on there is through emails people send me encouraging me to spread the word that there IS some positive coming out of the war. For example, I got an email about how many new schools have been/are being built in Iraq. I got one about a man whose job used to be to make busts of Hussein, and recently, used the same material to make a big statue of a little Iraqui girl thanking an American soldier. I have no idea if these things are true, but it sure would be nice to hear it on the NEWS! Do we HAVE to hear ONLY about death and destruction? Can we hear ANYTHING that we ARE accomplishing over there? We know there must be something good happening over there, but we're so innundated with the horrible stuff, we can't really know. Isn't it the media's responsibility to report on ALL of what's going on there? Don't the people have a right to know EVERYTHING -- bad AND good?
Civilian
[ *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
Son N Law
The thing is, though, C: a lot of those feel-good stories are so twisted they barely resemble the truth. Not all of them, but a lot of them. The statue to which you refer? The military paid that sculpter $10,000. He didn't do it because he was grateful.

I have seen news stories about the rebuilding of schools and hospitals. They're there. But is it any surprise that the bad outweighs the good? War is a horrible, awful, terrible thing.

I've got an old friend in Iraq right now -- the only son of my childhood pastor. He's still a child, as far as I'm concerned. He thought he was going to Iraq as a chaplain. Instead, he ended up as a gunner on a Humvee. Two weeks ago, on a patrol, the Humvee in front of him in a convoy was blown up by a roadside bomb. He lost two very, very close friends that day.

So, honestly, I don't want to hear about rainbows and sunshine. Even if you support this war (and I don't -- I support our soldiers, but not this war), you have to agree that, for the most part, it ain't goin' so well.
Member Avatar
Fool, apparently
[ *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
cboykin
Eye, I think this is where being civil and controvery collide -- perfect example. I have too much respect for SNL to "come back" at him. He obviously feels very strongly about this, and if I were to respond with my feelings (which aren't as strong as his), it would do nothing to further the discussion. It would only lead to hard feelings. Therefore, I choose to not respond. So, I think this might answer your prod to "get controversial." Don't know, though. ;)
Civilian
[ *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
Son N Law
Pfft! Come on, now. You know me better than that. Thick-skinned, remember? :)

Seriously, as long as you don't stoop to calling me unpatriotic, or implying that I don't support our troops (which is about as far from the truth as you could get), feel free to rebutt anything I said. I put it out there for the world to see. I fully expect it to be criticized.
Member Avatar
Fool, apparently
[ *  *  *  * ]
Quote Post Goto Top Offline Profile
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · The War on Terror · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Video of the Week (Gather Your Armies!):




Quote of the Week:


"Men when they're out of work tend to become abusive."

            -- Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D, NV), February 22, 2010, during debate of a "jobs" bill